
I’ve heard of Moon Pies and not sure if I’ve heard of Scooter Pies but somehow managed not to have any experience with either until today. I thought it was kind of interesting that both claim to be “the Original”.
These seem to have such tasty potential: Chocolate, cookie and marshmallow. What could go wrong?
Scooter Pie:
So…I guess something happened on the way home from the store because when I opened the package, the marshmallow was squished out of the “sandwich”. It turns out it that didn’t really matter. The marshmallow didn’t have he capability to go far as it’s was like a thick, bouncy glue.
Ethan and I were surprised that it didn’t taste very good. The marshmallow was blah, the chocolate was pretty much undetectable and I thought the cookie had kind of a chemical taste, Ethan thought he tasted a hint of banana.
The cookie texture was odd to us too: not crisp but not soft. Like stale but according to the expiration date, it wasn’t due for the trash until the end of next month.
Moon Pie:
Moon Pie looked better but I guess just because it had a less traumatic ride home from the store. I haven’t done any research, so I don’t know if these are secretly owned by the same master company but we found this to taste identically – which we both described as “gross”
Wrap up:
I feel a little bad not liking either of these because I know one of these must be very popular but neither were edible beyond 2 bites. Fake chocolate, gluey marshmallow and stale-like cookies were all we tasted.
I can imagine a home-made version of these would be fantastic though.
Everyone agreed that these were very sweet and moist. my brother-in-law Rick really liked the cream. I like the cream and how the chocolate coating stayed on even when cutting or biting into. Steph said she liked the consistency and mom said she thought it was okay but would like it if it had more chocolate flavor.
Despite the orange color the creme has the same vanilla flavor as the Little D rolls. Mom and Rick though these were more moist. The cream didn’t seem as sweet as Debbie’s but considering how extremely sweet those were that wasn’t abad thing. Mom liked that these had more chocolate flavor, although we all noted and weren’t crazy about how easily the cocolate coating flaked off.
These have a grainy texture which at least gives you the illusion you’re eating something mildly healthy. I felt like there was a slight chemical taste to them. Rick and Ethan said they were a little dry but really liked the fruit filling. Steph changed her mind didn’t try these saying she knew she liked the other brand better. We asked Kyle if he liked these and he just nodded his head.
Fruit & Grain was slightly different because of the swirled icing on top. I didn’t really notice much taste from that but Steph said that’s why she likes these bars better. She also said she likes how moist they are. We all agreed they were more moist but to me the extreme softness seemed “un-natural” like it was a doughnut or something. There was also a checmical taste to these like with the Nutri-Grain.
Opening these individually wrapped cookies releases a Twinkie-like aroma, which is artificial but sweet and characteristic of a mass-produced “bakery” treat.
Mrs. F’s cookies were a little bit dryer, although in comparison to Lil’ D’s ultral moist and slightly oily cookies, this wasn’t a surprise. Also the texture and taste were more “oatmealy” and there was more creme that had a bit more vanilla flavor to it. Ethan said these tasted “more honest” and I agreed that these provided at least more of an illusion of eating an actual oatmeal cookie.
We all agreed the cake was pretty dry. I felt that it also wasn’t very chocolaty and Ethan said both the cake and the creme were artificial tasting and had a slight chemical aftertaste. Steph and mom weren’t impressed either but Rick seemed fine with it even with the admitted dryness of cake.
Mom thought these looked more appealing because they’re darker, I agreed. The cake was soft and moist and Rick pointed out that they were thinner, making for a more balanced creme-to-cake ratio. I liked the creme because it was like what they use in their Swiss Rolls. Mom said she could live without them (as she says about most things) but they weren’t bad.
zza and a Hostess cupcake. My sister and I seriously were excited to be allowed to eat what “normal” kids ate all the time.
By the way, the last time I ate one of these was probably in the above photo but I expected total awesomeness. Instead, Ethan and I both found these to be a little dry in the cake area and had a very mild chocolate flavor. In fact they really didn’t taste like anything. The frosting seemed a kind of waxy and bland and the cream middle had just a hint of vanilla. Ethan noted there was also a chemical after taste.
I really like the mimic of the icing loops on the top of the cupcake. It’s enough to associate with Hostess but then the hextagonal form of the cupcake says “I’m my own thing!”. And they were in the way that they actually tasted like chocolate and the cake was moist. We agreed the cream inside was more enjoyable, as it wasn’t as gritty as Hostess. Also the outer coating wasn’t as waxy and tasteless too.
These had a sweet smell and Marc described them as “Eastery”, I asked him to elaborate and he said they were malty. The cake was spongy but firm, maybe just a teeny bit dry but not too bad. The creme was light and airy and had a nice hint of vanilla. Sara described it as tasting like marshmallow. In all, this wasn’t too bad and we all agreed this was very similar to a Twinkie.
These had a very strong, sweet smell that seemed to be waiting to jump out of the wrapper. The cake was denser and the exterior is kind of greasy. We noticed the filling was heavier than Gold n’ Creme’s and was almost gluey in comparison. With the intensity of the smell, cake and filling, Marc said these seemed like they were made more for kids than for adults.
The crust on these were pretty thick, so was the filling. We felt it had a consistency of “goo” and it was very sweet, almost too sweet. Dave thought it at least smelled like apples. The sugary glaze was okay but seemed unbalanced with the overwhelming sweetness from the filling inside. There was some apple flavor, it wasn’t as disgusting as we thought it would be and might be good for someone who like things really sweet.
This was the only pie that came as two separate pieces. Right away we noticed that the crust on this was harder and had no flavor. Becca thought the filling was “tangy” in some way but we all agreed that the apple bits were little pieces of dehydrated apple preserved in the thickened corn syrup.
We liked the color of this – which is not shown properly in this photo – it was a nice golden brown. The filling wasn’t too goopy and was actually flavorful. It clearly had a good amount of apple pie spices and a nice filling-to-crust ratio. The crust itself was good, and glazed with a light coating of sugar. Also worth noting was that this the only pie of the four we tasted that listed “apples” as its first ingredient.
This was shaped like the hostess pie and looked okay on the outside, and even on the inside, but we were unimpressed with its taste. The crust was passable, but the filling had no taste at all and we felt like were just eating flavorless corn syrup with fake apple bits.
I had to admit it but I thought these looked pretty good. They had a nice color and the glaze was proportionally distributed across the textured top. When we opened these from the wrapper, Ethan thought they smelled like McDonald’s cookies. Biting into these, we noticed a slight lemon flavor in the glaze. The crust was nice and crunchy although the inside didn’t have a lot substance, almost like a dry cup cake but not as bad as I we were expecting.
Oh Deb, we both done some changing over the years but, what happened? This stick was very pale and pasty looking. When we bit into these, they crumbled and fell apart. There is no donut taste, actually none at all, they only tasted like sugar and flour. I was really surprised that these were no where near the addictive sticks I remembered from the days of yore. I took two small bites and that was all I could handle.
I’ll try to summarize what I found out about these: Basically, Ring Dings were first, Ding Dongs were second but were originally called King Dongs, then King Dons, then Big Wheels. Now they’re Ding Dongs but as I’ve mentioned in a previous post, I can’t keep up with companies buying each other. In the end, Hostess bought Drakes but you can read all the sorted details in this
I don’t know when they stopped wrapping Ring Dings individually in foil but they are paired in cellophane now. The cake was slightly dry but soft and the creme was good; moist and with just enough vanilla flavor. The outer chocolate coating was ok, not all that chocolaty in taste, but like chocolate it started to melt a little if held too long.
Ding Dongs are noticeably taller than Ring dings. I cut open a couple of these and neither of them had a continuous creme center, they seemed to be injected in two areas. Ethan found the creme to be plasticy and we both thought the chocolate coating was wax-like and stuck to our teeth. The cake was flavorless and dry.